<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Llm on The Lone C++ Coder's Blog</title><link>https://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/tags/llm/</link><description>Recent content in Llm on The Lone C++ Coder's Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 11:31:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/tags/llm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>We're using the wrong measure for LLM productivity</title><link>https://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/post/2026-03-01-wrong-measure-llms/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 11:31:00 -0500</pubDate><author>Timo Geusch</author><guid>https://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/post/2026-03-01-wrong-measure-llms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been spending a bit of time on LinkedIn lately after finally stopping my use of Xitter (you can find me on Mastodon instead). One of the tropes that I see being uncritically spouted over and over again is &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m sooooooo productive, by spending $gazillion in LLM credits a day I&amp;rsquo;ll generate my new product at 50,000 lines of code day&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I&amp;rsquo;m applauding your effort to build a new, much needed product to fill a gaping hole in the market place, I&amp;rsquo;m sorry my dude (because it&amp;rsquo;s almost always a dude), but all you&amp;rsquo;re doing is generating technical debt at high velocity for a brief amount of time. Jon Bentley pointed out in his essays that turned into the book &amp;ldquo;Programming Pearls&amp;rdquo; (look it up) back in the 1980s that confusing, I&amp;rsquo;m sorry, measuring productivity by looking at the lines of code written is All The Wrong Measurements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>