Comments for The Lone C++ Coder's Blog http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com The continued diary of an experienced C++ programmer Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:43:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on How to view undecorated DLL-exported C++ symbols in Visual Studio 2010 by Timo Geusch http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/03/how-to-view-undecorated-dll-exported-c-symbols-in-visual-studio-2010/#comment-923 Timo Geusch Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:43:22 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/01/how-to-view-undecorated-dll-exported-c-symbols-in-visual-studio-2010/#comment-923 Dependency viewer is a great tool, but in this case I needed to feed the text output into another tool so something that just displays the function names wasn't doing what I needed. Dependency viewer is a great tool, but in this case I needed to feed the text output into another tool so something that just displays the function names wasn’t doing what I needed.

]]> Comment on How to view undecorated DLL-exported C++ symbols in Visual Studio 2010 by Martin http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/03/how-to-view-undecorated-dll-exported-c-symbols-in-visual-studio-2010/#comment-858 Martin Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:16:50 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/01/how-to-view-undecorated-dll-exported-c-symbols-in-visual-studio-2010/#comment-858 Strange, why don't you just use the Dependency Viewer? (...\Common7\Tools\Bin\Depends.exe) (Though this seems to be missing in the express edition, so your post using only the command line tools is still useful for express edition users.) Strange, why don’t you just use the Dependency Viewer? (…\Common7\Tools\Bin\Depends.exe)

(Though this seems to be missing in the express edition, so your post using only the command line tools is still useful for express edition users.)

]]> Comment on Very nice and concise blog post about Boost.Test by Alex Ott http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/03/very-nice-and-concise-blog-post-about-boost-test/#comment-241 Alex Ott Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:20:09 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=80#comment-241 I also wrote <a href="http://alexott.net/en/cpp/CppTestingIntro.html" rel="nofollow">small article</a> on unit testing in C++, that covers Boost.Test and Google Mocking framework. Although I'm thinking to improve it, covering Turtle (mocking library on top of Boost), Quickcheck++, and maybe Google C++ Testing framework I also wrote small article on unit testing in C++, that covers Boost.Test and Google Mocking framework. Although I’m thinking to improve it, covering Turtle (mocking library on top of Boost), Quickcheck++, and maybe Google C++ Testing framework

]]> Comment on If your VS2010 C++ build is constantly rebuilding a project that hasn’t changed… by Timo Geusch http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/03/if-your-vs2010-c-build-is-constantly-rebuilding-a-project-that-hasnt-changed/#comment-239 Timo Geusch Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:24:32 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=69#comment-239 I've never heard of this option either, but given that I've still got one or two projects that like rebuilding themselves at odd times, I think I'll try to make use of it! I’ve never heard of this option either, but given that I’ve still got one or two projects that like rebuilding themselves at odd times, I think I’ll try to make use of it!

]]> Comment on If your VS2010 C++ build is constantly rebuilding a project that hasn’t changed… by Len Holgate http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2011/03/if-your-vs2010-c-build-is-constantly-rebuilding-a-project-that-hasnt-changed/#comment-215 Len Holgate Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:35:59 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=69#comment-215 I just had a client of mine fix one of these issues in one of the solutions that I sent them; I had it on my list of things to fix but hadn't got around to it... Anyway, we had to go to "Tools, Options, Projects and Solutions, VC++ Project Settings" and set Solution Explorer mode to "show all files" to actually SEE the files that didn't exist and that were causing the rebuild. I didn't even know that option existed :) I just had a client of mine fix one of these issues in one of the solutions that I sent them; I had it on my list of things to fix but hadn’t got around to it… Anyway, we had to go to “Tools, Options, Projects and Solutions, VC++ Project Settings” and set Solution Explorer mode to “show all files” to actually SEE the files that didn’t exist and that were causing the rebuild. I didn’t even know that option existed :)

]]> Comment on Sometimes, std::set just doesn’t cut it from a performance point of view by Timo Geusch http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2010/12/sometimes-stdset-just-doesnt-cut-it-from-a-performance-point-of-view/#comment-74 Timo Geusch Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:40:16 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=43#comment-74 Thanks for the tip - I haven't tried that (partially because it would require this change in every subproject so we don't accidentally mix the various build configurations of the STL). It would be interesting if it does change the speed difference between the vector implementation and the set implementation or if the relative speed between the two stays the same. Thanks for the tip – I haven’t tried that (partially because it would require this change in every subproject so we don’t accidentally mix the various build configurations of the STL). It would be interesting if it does change the speed difference between the vector implementation and the set implementation or if the relative speed between the two stays the same.

]]> Comment on Sometimes, std::set just doesn’t cut it from a performance point of view by Rride http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2010/12/sometimes-stdset-just-doesnt-cut-it-from-a-performance-point-of-view/#comment-70 Rride Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:53:41 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=43#comment-70 Have you used the _SECURE_SCL=0 define? If not it may give approximately 1.5x-2x speedup on operations with STL containers. Have you used the _SECURE_SCL=0 define? If not it may give approximately 1.5x-2x speedup on operations with STL containers.

]]> Comment on Using CEDET-1.0 pre7 with Emacs 23.2 by Timo Geusch http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2010/08/using-cedet-1-0-pre7-with-emacs-23-2/#comment-46 Timo Geusch Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:32:37 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=12#comment-46 Thanks for the snippet - I'll definitely try that! Thanks for the snippet – I’ll definitely try that!

]]> Comment on Using CEDET-1.0 pre7 with Emacs 23.2 by Ji Han http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2010/08/using-cedet-1-0-pre7-with-emacs-23-2/#comment-40 Ji Han Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:42:06 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=12#comment-40 tried something similar in essence, but it didn't work for me. semantic was complaining. [guess the reason's that all sub-dirs of the built-in CEDET are in the load-path. to get the load-path clean, one needs to recursively remove them all.] P.S. the code snippet <blockquote> (setq load-path (remove (concat (replace-regexp-in-string "bin/$" "" invocation-directory) "lisp/cedet/") load-path)) </blockquote> tried something similar in essence, but it didn’t work for me.
semantic was complaining.

[guess the reason's that all sub-dirs of the built-in CEDET are in the load-path.
to get the load-path clean, one needs to recursively remove them all.]

P.S. the code snippet

(setq load-path
(remove
(concat
(replace-regexp-in-string “bin/$” “” invocation-directory)
“lisp/cedet/”)
load-path))

]]> Comment on Looks like CEDET 1.0 pre7 has been out for a while by Alex Ott http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/2010/07/looks-like-cedet-1-0-pre7-has-been-out-for-a-while/#comment-2 Alex Ott Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:14:43 +0000 http://www.lonecpluspluscoder.com/?p=3#comment-2 CVS version already contains lot of fixes and improvements over the -pre7 version ;-) CVS version already contains lot of fixes and improvements over the -pre7 version ;-)

]]>